More Responses to Obergefell vs. Hodges
June 28, 2015
The Anglican Church in North America responds at some length.
Scott Walker made a great statement in response to the Supreme Court decision.
Five unelected judges have taken it upon themselves to redefine the institution of marriage, an institution that the author of this decision acknowledges ‘has been with us for millennia.’ . . .
A Discouraging Word
July 1, 2011
From “Marital Marshall Plan”, an interview on National Review Online:
Lopez: You talk about rebuilding a culture of marriage. But are we too far gone?
Donovan: If by “we” you mean the United States or the West, yes, possibly.
Yes, Marriage Is worth Defending
October 6, 2009
Even from a Non-Christian Perspective
I’m sympathetic to the libertarian argument (made by many, including many Christians) that the state should completely get out of the marriage business. From this point of view, we can avoid all the rancorous public fights over same-sex marriage, etc. if we can all agree that it’s not the government’s business whether a given couple (or group, in the case of polygamy or “polyamory”) is “married”.
Ultimately, however, I’m inclined to disagree. Even judging only by non-religious utilitarian criteria, I think the state should recognize—and (if only by recognizing) encourage—marriage. Read the rest of this entry »