Ted Cruz Is the Strongest Candidate on Immigration

March 6, 2016

Donald Trump has repeatedly suggested that the media and the other candidates wouldn’t even be talking about illegal immigration if it weren’t for him, and his supporters certainly seem to think Trump’s “strong” positions on illegal immigration are a core reason to vote for him.  But do the facts match this narrative?

1 — In fact, Ted Cruz has been consistently in favor of building a wall, double-layered fence, or other serious barrier along the southern border for years.  As Patterico points out, this was Cruz’s position when he was running for Senate in 2012:

Patterico points out that this was still Cruz’s position in March 2015, months before Trump launched his presidential campaign; in fact, Cruz talked about the need to secure the border in his campaign-launch speech on March 23rd.

So Cruz has been consistently pro-wall since at least 2012.  Meanwhile what have Donald Trump’s positions been?

2 — In 2012, Trump repeatedly denounced both deporting illegal immigrants and Mitt Romney’s relatively moderate pro-enforcement position—Romney favored employment enforcement leading to gradual, voluntary “self-deportation”.  Specifically, Trump called the idea of self-deportation “crazy” and “maniacal”, elaborating, “It sounded as bad as it was, and he lost all of the Latino vote . . . .”  Trump also said of deportation:

I’m one of the world’s very conservative people, but I have to tell you on a human basis, how do you throw somebody out that’s lived in this country for 20 years.

3 — In the Republican presidential debates, Trump has repeatedly revealed that he doesn’t know his own campaign’s policy on immigration, as published on the official Donald J. Trump campaign Web site.

4 — Trump’s new 2015-2016 pro-wall position is still to the left of Ted Cruz.  Cato’s Michael Tanner at NRO a month ago (after the Iowa caucuses) tried to sort out what the frontrunners’ actual positions are.  He’s not the only one to point out that when you look behind the bluster, Trump’s actual stated position includes a form of amnesty:

Immigration: Opposition to illegal immigration has been, of course, Trump’s signature issue. He promises to deport all undocumented immigrants currently living in the U.S., and to build a wall, and make Mexico pay for it. Beyond that, however, his position gets a little murkier. He has suggested, for example, that after deporting current illegals, he would somehow allow “the good ones” to return. At times he has seemed to embrace Jeff Sessions–style opposition to further legal immigration. At others he has spoken of having “a big, beautiful door” in his wall, and of the need to welcome skilled immigrants.

While he offers some fair criticisms of Cruz and Rubio’s rhetoric and positions as well, Tanner concludes that

[Cruz] now is a firm opponent of legalization, calls for slowing legal immigration, and is a near-Trumpian advocate for building a wall. On the other hand, he opposes Trump-like mass deportations, sort of putting him in the Mitt Romney “self-deportation” camp.

In short, Cruz is the strongest, most consistently pro-enforcement candidate in the race.  Cruz is the best candidate on immigration.

Advertisements

5 Responses to “Ted Cruz Is the Strongest Candidate on Immigration”

  1. Snoodickle Says:

    Ted Cruz’s best attribute: he’s not Donald Trump.


  2. […] Trump’s followers don’t primarily support him because of his positions on the issues.  If their priority were immigration enforcement, they would all be for Ted Cruz.  Trump’s stated positions appear to move to and fro according to what he considers to be […]


  3. […] to articulate conservative principles (and reframe the debate in their favor); remember also that Cruz was pro-wall back when Trump was a liberal Democrat, and talked like it.  Cruz is the consistent conservative; Trump was a liberal Democrat until the day before […]


  4. […] though arguably he says whatever he thinks is to his advantage at any given time, which changes from year to year or even from week to […]


  5. […] Four years ago he was anti-enforcement on immigration; now he’s supposedly pro-enforcement. […]


Agree? Disagree? Thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: