Responding to the Other Side of Today’s Marriage Decision: ‘Intellectual Prostitution’, the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Rule of Law

June 26, 2015

Re today’s Supreme Court decision, the blog Intellectual Prostitution (“Love Rules and So Does SCOTUS”) argues,

And Scalia’s dissent has only proven how asinine the arguments against marriage equality have always been.

…the Court ends this debate, in an opinion lacking even a thin veneer of law…Buried beneath the mummeries and straining-to-be-memorable passages of the opinion is a candid and startling assertion: No matter what it was the People ratified, the Fourteenth Amendment protects those rights that the Judiciary, in its ‘reasoned judgment,’ thinks the Fourteenth Amendment ought to protect.

So his argument is that it isn’t necessarily wrong, but the court shouldn’t do it. Kind of.

I’m not sure you’ve understood Scalia’s point. I haven’t read the full dissent, but just based on your excerpt, it seems clear that he’s saying that the Fourteenth Amendment, as ratified, did not mean what the majority is now saying it means.  (Did a supermajority of states think they were responding to slavery and the Civil War by constitutionally requiring same-sex marriage?)  The point of having a written constitution is that its meaning is knowable and reliable.  If five judges say that it means one thing one day and another the next, and just impose whatever policy they prefer, then it represents not the rule of law but the rule of men.

Bonus:  In response to my query, the author agrees that to reach this result, Justice Anthony Kennedy had to commit “intellectual prostitution”, but “I do not see that as a bad thing”!

Advertisements

2 Responses to “Responding to the Other Side of Today’s Marriage Decision: ‘Intellectual Prostitution’, the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Rule of Law”

  1. kayceeeliz Says:

    That is correct. I don’t. “All thoughts are for sale”, as in all thoughts are out there for the public. Thanks for taking my comment out of context !


  2. […] response as to Intellectual Prostitution:  Did a supermajority of states think they were responding to slavery and the Civil War by […]


Agree? Disagree? Thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: