It has attracted national media attention.  Politico calls it “a bitter campaign”.  The Washington Post calls it a “soap opera”.  Candidate Matt Bevin calls it a “food fight”:

Read the rest of this entry »

This kind of shady back-room dealing sounds like something out of House of Cards.

Conservative Review’s Nate Madden and National Review Online’s Brendan Bordelon have been doing some old-fashioned investigative journalism.  Here’s the background:  Under Obamacare, if Congress had to get health insurance through a government “exchange” like ordinary Americans, it would mean

giving up government-subsidized health-care contributions of between $5,000 and $10,000 per person.  The White House scrambled to find a way to allow congressional employees to keep those subsidies. In Washington, D.C., only the small-business exchange allowed them to do so. After secret meetings with House speaker John Boehner in 2013, President Obama instructed the Office of Personnel Management to allow Congress to file for classification as a small business, despite the fact that the law defines a small business as having no more than 50 employees and the House and Senate together employ tens of thousands.

Read the rest of this entry »

Kevin Williamson at NRO has a good line about the comparative behavior of the free market and the government:

A poor black man from Baltimore, or a poor white man from eastern Kentucky, would have to jump through a great many hoops before he would be granted a job interview with Professor Hyman’s former colleagues at McKinsey or his current colleagues at Cornell. But a man with $10 in his hand is the same as any other man with $10 in his hand, regardless of race, background, or accent, when he is standing at the register at Walmart or Target. And unlike entities supported by government “investments” — like Atlanta’s schools or Baltimore’s police — Walmart reliably keeps its end of the bargain: You pay Walmart $20 for a pair of shoes, you get the shoes.

Read the rest of this entry »

Continuing the discussion of the weekend’s victory for free speech in Texas, Jim Geraghty gets in some good lines.

Is it just me, or have we just invented a form of Islamist/jihadist/ISIS flypaper?

They wore body armor. They carried assault rifles. And one had declared loyalty to ISIS.

Read the rest of this entry »

Jihadi Appleseed

This is very good news.  Ten years after the Danish newspaper the Jyllands-Posten took a stand for freedom by publishing a dozen drawings of Mohammed, America has produced some high-profile public Mohammed drawings of our own:  The American Freedom Defense Initiative organized a big Mohammed Art Exhibit & Contest in Garland, Texas on Sunday, May 3rd (you heard it here first).  See some of the drawings here (warning: some rude content).  Via Creeping Sharia, Breitbart has some more of the drawings.  (Apparently they received hundreds of entries in all.)

Read the rest of this entry »

From what I hear (Professor John Eastman’s excellent summary of today’s oral arguments), the good guys did surprisingly well at the Supreme Court today, and right out of the gate, swing-vote Kennedy came out swinging (audio here):

JUSTICE GINSBURG: What do you do with the Windsor case where the court stressed the Federal government’s historic deference to States when it comes to matters of domestic relations?

Read the rest of this entry »

Via The Volokh Conspiracy: Wonkblog breathlessly reports on “The disturbing differences in what men want in their wives and their daughters”:

When asked what qualities they want in in a wife, American heterosexual men said they value “attractive” and “sweet” women, a national survey recently found. Only 34 percent, however, said they wanted a romantic partner who is “independent.”

Read the rest of this entry »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 157 other followers